Here is an online comment from an anti-US blogger who has been watching our nations political infighting then using these comments to lambaste our nation into further dividing. He states; Bush said that we were going to war with Iraq because of their support of the terrorists.

Yet what the anti-American does not say about Saddam was that; He was a terrorist to the Kurds. And he threatened us too and Israel. He sent people to try to assassinate a United States President. And his mustache looked like crap, major social statement of the time.

Next the anti-American foreigner states; No weapons of mass destruction, nothing.

They went to Syria, common knowledge in intelligent circles, it is not even a secret really, even books out on the subject now. But again he uses our own critiques of our own political divide as ammo to further divide all Americans.

Next he states; So excuse me if I don't believe Bush when he calls on us again, to start war in ANOTHER country (quite possibly nuclear) when we haven't cleaned up our mess from the last one.

We live in a Republic and thankfully our nations leadership will do what ever it takes to protect us regardless of the mindless masses piss poor mass media warped brains. In other words just can it, no cares what you think and the facts are Iran is a treat and its leadership is nuts, they have sent insurgents in to try and kill my brother USMC in Iraq. The continually fund international terrorist organizations, they have threatened or promised to blow Israel off the map.

Making them a nation state that not only sponsors terrorism but is a terrorist. What you believe is so utterly irrelevant it is not up for discussion, the game is afoot, Iran is preparing for war, we must pre-empt; end of story, they are playing their chess pieces for war. By you stating this malarkey you are indeed helping the self-declared enemy of the United States of America? And to that I think you should apologize to myself, my brother and the American people and go sit down and shut up and take your liberal BS, NYTs rhetoric and can it. Consider this in 2006.